Editorial standards & methodology.
How we source, write, review and correct our guides—and how we put trading evidence in context.
Who writes and reviews
RoboXpert is the pen name of the person who writes this website and develops their own trading software. Experience is described as supplied by the author, not as independently verified credentials. Final factual review is the author's responsibility. A second reviewer is credited only when a separate person has actually reviewed the work. The author approved the first two guides for publication on 20 September 2026. This is author approval, not an independent review or a certification of trading results.
Choose sources readers can inspect
Use primary documentation for platform behaviour, official terms for product conditions and original records for reported results. Link sources near the claims they support and record when changeable information was checked. Distinguish a vendor's claim from our own observation. When sources disagree or evidence is missing, explain the uncertainty instead of presenting a guess as a fact.
Identify the evidence
Historical backtests, out-of-sample tests, demo forward tests and live-account records answer different questions. Every research report must label its evidence type. A simulated result must never be presented as live performance.
Make the conditions visible
Reports should identify the product and version, instrument, period, data source, settings, account type and execution assumptions. Commission, spread, slippage and financing costs must be included or their omission explained.
Keep risk beside results
Profit alone is not an evaluation. Where the data supports it, reports should also discuss equity drawdown, floating exposure, losing periods, trade count and sensitivity to market conditions. Missing data should be identified rather than estimated without explanation.
Explain what verification means
A third-party account record is useful evidence, not a guarantee of strategy quality or future performance. Account verification, data provenance and the limitations of any external record should be described separately.
Keep the work traceable
Published guides require a named author, relevant sources and a publication date. Material changes receive an updated date. Claims about hands-on testing require the underlying files or records; AI-generated drafts require human factual review.
Explain AI assistance and illustrations
AI may assist with research, drafting, code and illustrations. It is not a source or a substitute for checking factual claims, calculations and code behaviour. Articles disclose the assistance used. Hypothetical examples and generated illustrations are labelled. The robot avatar represents the RoboXpert pen name; it is not a photograph, a separate author or a reviewer.
Correct errors and maintain dates
Material factual corrections should identify what changed and when in the affected article. Recheck the supporting source and any related calculations or conclusions. Qualify or remove claims that cannot be supported. Typographical fixes and layout changes do not justify a new editorial date. Platform or product changes should trigger a review of the relevant guidance, rather than an automatic freshness update.
Show commercial interests
RoboXpert develops its own trading software. Own-product pages are labelled accordingly. Any future affiliate links or paid placements must be disclosed, and their commercial status must not be presented as independent evidence.